Author & content team

Last updated:

Why we publish under a team byline instead of individual names

Financial content, especially content touching on a specific company's regulatory status or complaint history, benefits from more than one set of eyes. Rather than attribute an article to a single writer, we treat every published piece as a team output: one contributor typically drafts the research and initial write-up, a second reviews the sourcing and cross-checks the primary links, and any factual claim about registration status or a specific complaint record is verified independently before publication. The "Pesohere.top Editorial Team" byline reflects this shared responsibility rather than obscuring who did the work.

Content on this site is produced and maintained by the Pesohere.top editorial team, a small group focused specifically on the Philippine online lending market and the practical questions borrowers actually search for. We publish under a shared byline, "Pesohere.top Editorial Team," rather than individual writer names, because our content goes through a collective research and review process rather than being the sole output of any one person. The team follows our editorial policy and updates listings as lenders change their offers, and periodically reviews published research articles for continued accuracy.

What our team focuses on

Our work falls into two related areas. The first is our comparison listings, where we track publicly available details — loan amounts, eligibility requirements, approval speed, and general cost information — across a handful of licensed lending platforms operating in the Philippines, so readers can shortlist an option without installing several apps just to compare basics. The second is our Pesohere Review Philippines research section, where we investigate a specific loan app in more depth: checking its SEC registration status directly against official government records, reviewing publicly filed complaints, and calculating effective interest rates against the SEC's regulatory ceiling for small, short-term loans.

Our background and approach

Our team includes contributors with backgrounds in financial content research, consumer protection reporting, and web publishing, based in the Philippines and familiar with the day-to-day experience of applying for a short-term online loan here. We are not licensed financial advisors, lawyers, or SEC-accredited auditors, and nothing we publish should be read as a substitute for professional advice specific to your situation. What we do bring is a habit of checking primary sources — official government portals, a company's own app store listing, and publicly filed regulatory records — before publishing a claim, rather than repeating something we found on a forum or social media post without verifying it first ourselves.

How we credit sources and evidence

Throughout our research articles, you'll find direct links to the specific government pages, official portals, or public filings that support each factual claim we make, particularly for anything involving a company's registration status or documented complaints. We do this so you never have to simply trust our summary — you can click through and check the primary source yourself, at any time, without needing to take our word for it. Where we can't verify something to our own standard, we say so explicitly rather than presenting it with more confidence than the evidence supports.

Corrections we've made

We believe an author page should be honest about the review process, including when we've gotten something wrong and fixed it. For example, an earlier version of our SEC registration research on the Pesohere loan app relied on a static, periodically updated SEC list that did not show a match for the company in question. After further verification directly through the SEC's live Check portal, we updated that article to reflect the stronger, more current evidence of registration we found. We'd rather correct our own work publicly, with a clear explanation of what changed and why, than leave an outdated conclusion standing indefinitely.

Independence from the companies we cover

Our editorial team operates independently from the lenders and apps we write about, and no company we cover is given the opportunity to review or approve an article before it is published. As explained in our disclaimer, Pesohere.top is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the Pesohere loan app, Super-Space PH Lending Inc., or TechTack Lending Corporation, despite the similarity in branding. Our comparison listings may include referral relationships with certain lenders, disclosed on our About page, but this does not extend to our independent research articles, which are not sponsored by their subject companies.

Tools and sources we rely on regularly

Our research process leans heavily on a small set of trusted primary sources rather than general web searches alone. These include the SEC's official Check portal for verifying corporate registration numbers directly, the SEC's published lists of lending and financing companies, the National Privacy Commission's citizen's charter for understanding data privacy complaint processes, and the Freedom of Information portal (foi.gov.ph) for locating dated, publicly filed government records. We also review each lender's own official app store listing and website, since discrepancies between a company's marketing claims and its official government record are often the most useful signal for readers trying to judge a lender's legitimacy.

How to reach us, and what to include

Questions about a specific article or listing, requests for corrections, or general feedback about our research can be sent to admin@pesohere.top, or through our contact page. If you're reporting a possible factual error, it helps enormously if you include a link to the specific article, the exact claim you believe is incorrect, and, where possible, a link to the source you believe supports the correction — this lets us verify and update the article faster than a general "this seems wrong" message would allow. We read every message and aim to respond within a reasonable timeframe, particularly for correction requests involving factual accuracy on SEC registration status or documented complaint records.